NewElitism

Seriously, this stuff is really, really great. “Badass of the Week” [LINK] is a page that deals with, well, people that are badass. The author goes to great lengths explaining the various badass deeds of a wide variety of people. I’ll give you a taste:

About Thor Heyerdal [Wikipedia]

Then he published a scientific paper called, “Eat Shit, Motherfuckers: The True Story of How Thor Heyerdahl Made You Assholes Look Like a Bunch of Fucking Morons”, which stated that his adventure proved that it was in fact scientifically possible for the Incans to have settled in Polynesia.

About Rommel [Wikipedia]

But Rommel wasn’t just going to sit back like some fucking chumpburger and do lame shit like dig trenches and erect fortifications - he was going to go nutsack-to-the-wall and charge a force of over 700 tanks with his group of about 260 tanks and some Italian motorized infantrymen riding around on Vespa scooters eating canolis.

About Ahmad Shah Massoud [Wikipedia]

Without the proper equipment and supplies, the Russians weren’t nearly as effective as they could be, and Massoud’s guerilla warfare skillz were more 1337 than a mad hax0r invading a LAN party at the senior citizen’s center.

This is just a taste, there’s quite a collection of articles on lots of pretty badass people. Enjoy.

Came across this video a few weeks ago. Watched it a few times since then and it’s still great.

Two points about the video come to mind:

1. What was the Bataan death march?

A rather unpleasant episode during the war in the Pacific. Tens of thousands of Filipino and American POWs werde marched from one camp to another in the Philippines in 1942 and many thousands died due to cruel treatment and wanton executions by the Japanese army as well as malnutrition, dehydration and disease. Check out Wikipedia.

2. How does this relate to the upgrade cycle of proprietary software?

Although I admit that the comparison is quite drastic, there is some truth in it. Using proprietary software exposes companies (and to a lesser extent individuals) to a business strategy that is crucial for many makers of proprietary software: The Upgrade Cycle. Whenever a new version of the product is released, its users can decide if the want to upgrade.

Now, because it is customary to end support for an earlier version of a product some time after a new one has been released, this decision is not a real one. Instead the customer is ‘helped along’ by deliberate little incompatibilities that make it just a little easier to use the current version than the old one.

A very nice example is provided by Microsoft with its ‘Office’ line of products. Nearly every version has been incompatible with its predecessor and to avoid these annoyances companies upgrade and consumers get the new version from that friend that always gives them copied software.

This of course, besides being an annoyance causes corporate IT departments a lot of work ( I know, I’ve worked in one) and prevents them from having any kind of long-term strategy. They are slugging along the (death) march of the upgrade cycle and are forced to spend money on software, hardware and manpower while dancing to the manufacturers beat.

There are of course gradual differences. If you look at commercial UNIXes that are being supported for decades it’s a whole different thing. But the problem doesn’t lie in the duration of the support. The customer should get to decide how long he will use a particular system. If you want to keep using your old fleet of company vans because you like the way they look, you can just pay a car mechanic to keep them running for you. Sure parts are going to be harder to find as time goes by but it’s just a question of how much you’re prepared to spend. The point is that YOU get to make a real decision.

The proprietary software industry is one where the customer definitely is not king.

photo by Steve Webel

I am responding to this post [link] on mainframe.gr. Vangelis Bibakis writes about how the past year was a lost one for Linux and brings up a couple of points. Go on and read them, but be warned: There aren’t really any valid arguments in there. After all, it is written by someone who admittedly uses a ‘W.A.M.P. (Windows Apache Mysql PHP)’ machine to code PHP [link].

The zealots issue (He writes about how Linux zealots install Linux on unsuspecting users’ PCs only for theM to find out later that there is no Photoshop on Linux and they can’t play their Windows games.)

I consider myself a Linux envangelist (I don’t like the term zealot). I have installed Linux for a number of people. I told them before that it is a new OS and that some things won’t work the way they do on Windows. And honestly: Does ‘Joe User’ (as Vangelis calls the average user) REALLY USE Photoshop? And even if he does use it, what are the chances that he is just using it to crop a picture or change the saturation in one every once in a while. YOU DON’T NEED PHOTOSHOP FOR THAT! And since it is probably pirated anyway, I might be doing someone like that a favour.

Playing the current Windows games is the only (!) reason why a home user might still want to have windows. If you don’t tell people about that before installing Linux for them, you are being a plain asshole.
Continue Reading »